Obama Signs “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act”

26 Dec 2016

So, we had a crisis created by the government claiming that Russia tampered with the election by hacking into email accounts (which has not been proven). This law was already in the works – probably waiting for an opportunity (real or fake) to add this into law.

Official Press Release – President Signs Portman-Murphy Counter-Propaganda Bill into Law

Obama Quietly Signs The “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” Into Law

Long before the “fake news” meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on such discredited mainstream portals as CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would task the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to “establish a Center for Information Analysis and Response,” which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and — in true dystopic manner — ‘develop and disseminate’ “fact-based narratives” to counter effrontery propaganda.

In short, long before “fake news” became a major media topic, the US government was already planning its legally-backed crackdown on anything it would eventually label “fake news.”

Fast forward to December 8, when the “Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act” passed in the Senate, quietly inserted inside the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Conference Report.

And now, following Friday’s Obama signing of the NDAA on Friday evening, the Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is now law.

And so, with the likes of WaPo having already primed the general public to equate “Russian Propaganda” with “fake news” (despite admitting after the fact their own report was essentially “fake”), while the US media has indoctrinated the public to assume that any information which is not in compliance with the official government narrative, or dares to criticize the establishment, is also “fake news” and thus falls under the “Russian propaganda” umbrella, the scene is now set for the US government to legally crack down on every media outlet that the government deems to be “foreign propaganda.”

Just like that, the US Ministry of Truth is officially born.


Families of Orlando Victims Sue Social Media

20 Dec 2016

Families of Orlando nightclub shooting victims sue Facebook, Twitter and Google

Families of the victims of the Orlando gay nightclub shooting on Monday filed a federal civil suit against Twitter, Facebook and Google for allegedly providing “material support” to the Islamic State and helping to radicalize shooter Omar Mateen.

ISIS quickly claimed responsibility for the attack via its Amaq news agency, although further investigation found that Mateen was not a member of the terror group but had been inspired by them in part through what he saw on the Internet.

“Mateen was radicalized by ISIS using the defendants tools for that express purpose,” Keith Altman, the lawyer representing the three families, told FoxNews.com.

ISIS maintains an active presence on both Facebook and Twitter and also relies heavily on the Google-owned YouTube to post propaganda messages and videos of executions.

It is interesting who these entities ban, and who they allow to be active. I can’t understand why anyone promoting jihad would be allowed to use these platforms in this country.

This is how the media steers the narrative

6 May 2014

Morning Plum: The GOP’s real position on immigration, laid bare – Wash. Post

Sentence 1.

Republicans face a very simple dilemma on immigration: Either they embrace reform, or they are inescapably the party of maximum deportations.

GOP Rep. Bob Goodlatte had an interview with a reporter at Univision.

Ramos repeatedly pressed Goodlatte to explain why it is that House Republicans refuse to act on immigration reform. Goodlatte repeatedly claimed the problem is that Republicans can’t trust Obama to enforce the law, as evidenced by the fact that deportations from the interior have dropped. Goodlatte explicitly said the problem is that only people convicted of serious crimes are getting deported from the interior.

Ramos then pressed Goodlatte on whether this means Republicans want to see more deportations from the interior. Goodlatte — who as chair of the House Judiciary Committee is a key player on immigration — refused to answer directly:

JORGE RAMOS: So your point is that you want more people to be deported?

BG: My point is that I want the President to enforce the law, and that way Congress will feel the pressure to reach a resolution to deal with the people who are lawfully here, who have been law abiding citizens.

The Senator answers the question directly. The law should be enforced. He is not focused on immigrants… he is focused on the law. The newspaper tells it differently.

This is how Republicans have boxed themselves in on this issue: They’ve defined “enforcing the law” as maximizing deportations from the interior, no matter who gets removed.

It’s not Republicans boxing themselves in – it’s the Washington Post misrepresenting the Senator’s answer. I want the laws to be adhered to in this country. I am not anti-immigrant – but follow the law. That’s all.

Maher “Agrees with Gingrich” on Occupiers

5 Feb 2012

Maher Turns on Occupiers, Denounces Them as D-bags That Should ‘Get a Job’

And as I watch them on the news now I find myself almost agreeing with Newt Gingrich. Like, you know what – get a job. Only because, you know, the people who originally started, I think they went home and now it’s just these anarchist stragglers.

The proverbial broken clock that’s right twice a day.

Video is at the link.

World’s Richest Man Increases Stock in NY Times

24 Aug 2011

Slim increases his stake in NY Times [Financial Times]

Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim Helu has increased his stake in the New York Times Company just weeks after the US newspaper group repaid the emergency $250m loan it took from Mr Slim in 2009.

Mr Slim upped his stake from 6.9 per cent to 7.3 per cent through the purchase of 553,000 class A shares, according to a regulatory filing.

Shares in the New York Times are down 29 per cent from six months ago as the group struggles to balance declining print advertising and circulation with new digital revenues,…

Mr Slim, now 71, is ranked by Forbes magazine as the world’s richest man, with a personal fortune of $74bn, His business interests range from tobacco and mining to banking and retail but most of his wealth stemmed from the acquisition, in 1990, of Telmex, the former state telecommunications monopoly.

Michael Moore Suggests Arrest of S&P Head

9 Aug 2011

Michael Moore to Obama: ‘Show some guts,’ arrest S&P head

On his Twitter feed Monday, the Oscar-winning film director also blamed the 2008 economic collapse on Standard & Poor’s — apparently because it and other credit-ratings agencies did not downgrade mortgage-based bonds, which encouraged the housing bubble and let it spread throughout the economy.

“Pres Obama, show some guts & arrest the CEO of Standard & Poors. These criminals brought down the economy in 2008& now they will do it again,” Mr. Moore wrote.

Mr. Moore went on to note that the “owners of S&P are old Bush family friends,” continuing a theme he has developed through several films about capitalism as essentially a crony system for the rich and Wall Street, especially the Bush family.

Sorry for wasting bandwidth on this – I just find it assuming.

TV Executives Admit Liberal Agenda

2 Jun 2011

TV Executives Admit in Taped Interviews That Hollywood Pushes a Liberal Agenda

Another video has Leonard Goldberg — who executive produces Blue Bloods for CBS and a few decades ago exec produced such hits as Fantasy Island, Charlie’s Angels and Starsky and Hutch — saying that liberalism in the TV industry is “100 percent dominant, and anyone who denies it is kidding, or not telling the truth.”

Shapiro asks if politics are a barrier to entry. “Absolutely,” Goldberg says.

When Shapiro tells Fred Pierce, the president of ABC in the 1980s who was instrumental in Disney’s acquisition of ESPN, that “It’s very difficult for people who are politically conservative to break in” to television, he responds: “I can’t argue that point.” Those who don’t lean left, he says, “don’t promote it. It stays underground.”

To those that pay attention to these things, this is not surprising. But they are feeling their oats in publicly proclaiming their liberal bias – or they are getting old and they don’t care who knows anymore.